The myth of leaving our comfort zone

In today’s personal development world, leaving our comfort zone has become a dogma. There are countless quotes such as “life begins out of your comfort zone.”

It is clear that you need to venture into new territories if you want to learn something.

However, are there limits to how much discomfort we actually need to experience? And what about the idea of having multiple comfort zones?

My personal observation is that even highly entrepreneurial people, who in their professional activity are constantly stepping out of their comfort zones, often prefer to remain within a comfort zone in other areas of their life—for example, when learning a foreign language.

This suggests that we need to maintain some areas of life where we stay within a comfort zone, in order to have the energy and stability to sustain discomfort in others.
Research supports this. Studies on stress and performance (e.g., Yerkes & Dodson, 1908; Csikszentmihalyi, 1990) show that learning and growth do not occur in states of overwhelming anxiety, but rather in conditions of moderate challenge combined with psychological safety. Having stable and predictable areas in life provides a resource that enables us to take calculated risks elsewhere.

We can describe two zones outside our comfort zone: the learning zone and the panic zone. This idea comes from the “Learning Zone Model” (White, 2009), which builds on earlier educational psychology. In this model, the “learning zone” is just beyond the comfort zone, where challenges are manageable and skills can expand. The “panic zone,” by contrast, is reached when challenges exceed our coping resources, leading to stress, withdrawal, or failure rather than growth.

Pushing people out of their comfort zone may actually be dangerous.
Outdoor education research has documented this risk. Studies (e.g., Becker, 2009; McKenzie, 2003) warn that pushing participants too far in adventure learning can result in accidents or psychological harm, rather than resilience or learning.

In communication training, there is rarely a risk of physical harm—unless we recall experimental psychotherapy methods such as Encounter Groups in the 1970s and 80s, where participants were sometimes encouraged to become physical.

But imagine pushing someone with stage fright onto a stage, unprepared and without support. There is a real chance that he or she may leave the experience not more self-confident, but more traumatized.
Indeed, research on public speaking anxiety (e.g., Bodie, 2010) shows that exposure without preparation can reinforce fear responses rather than reduce them. Effective interventions, such as gradual exposure or skills training, succeed precisely because they keep the experience within the learning zone instead of tipping into panic.

As in psychotherapy, the communication coach must ensure that each step out of the comfort zone is taken with sufficient preparation and inner resources. The goal is sustained personal growth—not proving in front of the coach or peers how much you dare.

Literature

Becker, P. (2009). The spell of the sensuous: Risk, responsibility and the learning process in outdoor education. Ethics and Education, 4(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449640902781346

Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903443849

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

McKenzie, M. (2003). Beyond “the outward bound process”: Rethinking student learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590302600104

White, A. (2009). From comfort zone to performance management: Understanding development and performance. Journal of Management Development, 28(5), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710910955985

Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503

---

Want to get rid of insecurity and bad feelings regarding the foreign language(s) you have already started to learn? Want to learn a new language, without going through various levels of standard courses? You feel you are making no progress?

Go to Amazon and grab a copy of my book ”The GO Method – breaking barriers to language learning”.

https://www.amazon.com/GO-Method-Breaking-barriers-language/dp/1973118688/ref=sr_1_1?crid=ZLMGYKR6PDY3&keywords=Gerhard+Ohrband&qid=1694099394&sprefix=gerhard+ohrband+%2Caps%2C239&sr=8-1

Get the first two chapters for free by subscribing to Gerhard's weekly newsletter, with advice and resources on communication psychology in international, multicultural and multilanguage contexts. Just click here.

--

Communication Psychology: in small and practical lessons once a week.

With a focus on international and multilingual business conversations.

Gerhard Ohrband is a psychologist from Hamburg/Germany, specialized in Communication Psychology. He coaches individuals and companies worldwide (in English, Swedish, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian and Russian) on how to avoid costly misunderstandings and handle conflicts with employees and clients.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why we need to train talking to bad people

10 situations you should practice in your language courses

Reversibility as a sign of respect