Can Conflicts Be Productive?


 We often hear that conflict is inherently negative—but is that always true? Should we avoid conflicts at all costs, or can they be catalysts for innovation, clarity, and growth?

In a TED Talk, Margaret Heffernan argues that conflict—particularly when paired with rigorous debate—sharpens thinking and leads to better outcomes. She recounts how epidemiologist Alice Stewart discovered a link between prenatal X-rays and childhood cancer, and was strengthened in her conviction by collaborator George Kneale, who relentlessly tried to disprove her findings—and couldn’t.

Types of Workplace Conflict

Research categorizes conflicts into three main types:

1.     Personal Conflict
This involves interpersonal issues—clashes of personality, style, or emotional friction. It's often linked to hostility, dissatisfaction, and lower group cohesion

2.     Task Conflict
This arises from disagreements over the content of tasks—opinions, ideas, goals, or strategies for accomplishing a task. It includes cognitive task conflict (differing views or knowledge) and procedural task conflict (disagreement on methods or protocols)

3.     Process Conflict
This occurs when there's disagreement about how tasks should be delegated or carried out—who does what, and the procedures involved. It often overlaps with personal conflict and tends to be more disruptive.

What Do Meta-Analyses Reveal?

Scientific evidence from meta-analyses (which synthesize findings of many individual studies) paints a nuanced picture:

·        Relationship and Process Conflicts consistently harm performance, well-being, and satisfaction.

·        Task Conflict is more complex: some studies show it can improve outcomes when managed well. Environments that foster psychological safety and open discussion norms tend to benefit from task conflict. However, when task conflict overlaps with relationship conflict, the benefits disappeared.

In short, productive conflict depends heavily on context: the nature of the disagreement and how it’s managed.

Personalities and culture

Some individuals naturally avoid conflict—they score high in traits like agreeableness and neuroticism and prefer interpersonal harmony. Their avoidance is often motivated by discomfort with disagreement or fear of threatening relationships.

Psychologically, conflict-avoidant people may shy away even from constructive debate—a drawback when task conflict could otherwise surface useful insights.

Culture plays a major role, too.

·        Individualistic cultures (e.g., many Western societies) tend to handle conflict directly—even competitively—and value assertiveness.

·        Collectivistic cultures, valuing harmony and face, more often adopt avoidance or obliging styles to preserve relationships.

Thus, while Western cultures may lean into conflict as a tool for problem-solving, more collective societies may avoid conflict—even constructive task disagreement—to protect group cohesion.

Disturbances Have Priority

In communication psychology, there’s a rule: disturbances have priority. That means any conflict—no matter how small—often carries unmet concerns or hidden information worth exploring.

Conflict can reveal issues that aren’t visible at first. The challenge is not to let these tensions be dismissed but to give them space for resolution and growth.

Final Thoughts

·        Avoiding all conflict is a mistake—valuable insights often hide in disturbances.

·        Task conflict can be an engine of innovation, but only when decoupled from emotional drama.

·        Moderation is everything: frameworks like rotating devil’s-advocate, cooling-off periods, and respectful dissent help maintain balance.

·        Personality and culture matter—understanding these dimensions helps tailor conflict approaches.

·        Ultimately, conflicts—when surfaced and guided constructively—can strengthen understanding, creativity, and team resilience.

 

Literature

Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024200

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

De Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024844

Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. C. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020015

Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638

---

Want to get rid of insecurity and bad feelings regarding the foreign language(s) you have already started to learn? Want to learn a new language, without going through various levels of standard courses? You feel you are making no progress?

Go to Amazon and grab a copy of my book ”The GO Method – breaking barriers to language learning”.

https://www.amazon.com/GO-Method-Breaking-barriers-language/dp/1973118688/ref=sr_1_1?crid=ZLMGYKR6PDY3&keywords=Gerhard+Ohrband&qid=1694099394&sprefix=gerhard+ohrband+%2Caps%2C239&sr=8-1

Get the first two chapters for free by subscribing to Gerhard's weekly newsletter, with advice and resources on communication psychology in international, multicultural and multilanguage contexts. Just click here.

--

Communication Psychology: in small and practical lessons once a week.

With a focus on international and multilingual business conversations.

Gerhard Ohrband is a psychologist from Hamburg/Germany, specialized in Communication Psychology. He coaches individuals and companies worldwide (in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian and Russian) on how to avoid costly misunderstandings and handle conflicts with employees and clients.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we need to train talking to bad people

Image
We live in a polarized world. Covid, migration, the Ukraine war, gender (and gender pronouns) or climate change: There is an ever-growing list of possibilities for division, for separating between our ingroup and the outgroup, between the good and the bad guys (and girls). Many of us simply refuse to speak to people with other opinions. We often hear this as an advice. You shouldn’t/cannot speak with evil people. Well, this is actually a very dangerous advice. The more we retreat from engaging in dialogue with people with other opinions and positions, the more vulnerable we become as communicators. This is one explanation why populist politicians are becoming so successful worldwide. Many establishment politicians have been living in a conversational bubble for years. They have been asked predictable and softball questions by more or less friendly journalists and colleagues. They have tried to build firewalls against their opponents. In short, they have relaxed the conversa...
Read more

10 situations you should practice in your language courses

Image
If you are familiar with contemporary language education, you will understand that practicing conversation during lessons is a key element for success. For previous generations, this was not the norm. Also due to classroom size and unprepared or insecure teachers, foreign language instruction relied heavily on pen and paper exercises. The result: excellent grades did not equal being able to talk freely. The next level is assessing how communication should be practiced. For many language learners, communication is just one homogenous block of activity. There are, however, considerable differences between ·         Preparing at home vs. reacting spontaneously ·         Talking to the teacher vs. communicating in small groups with other students ·         Focusing on playing it safe vs. experimenting with new ways of saying things ·      ...
Read more

5 proven ways to effectively self-sabotage your language learning

Image
In self-improvement and self-development, many of us have a hording or accumulative mentality: More skills, more life hacks, more insights. Often, the key is to just throw out mental clutter. As a psychologist myself, I am afraid to over-psychologize everything. Nonetheless, it is safe to say that more than 50% of our success of acquiring a new language depends on psychological issues: ·         Patience: Am I ready to wait years before expecting authentic fluency? ·         Self-discipline: Can I stick to a daily learning routine for more than 21 days? ·         Self-image: Do I really see myself as communicating fluently in foreign languages? ·         Risk-avoidance or tolerance: Am I willing to enter a conversation not being perfectly prepared? ·         Reactions to setbacks and failures: Should ...
Read more